The three main types of disagreements that people can have are listed below: So this type of disagreement can occur with quite reasonable people who do not make mistakes in the 8 categories above. Another common cause of disagreement is how people interpret their reality, and this is largely influenced by the type of personality someone has and their overall view of life. In such a case, you will probably find it much easier to find a solution that completely satisfies both people, and when this happens, you have just achieved a win-win situation, since everyone gets what they wanted in the end. This debate is important. We should seek fruitful disagreements, and that certainly includes understanding what the other party is saying. For example, Charles and Danielle`s obvious disagreement is not fruitful because it is based on a misunderstanding of Charles` words. But what does it take to understand each other? What would it take for Aurora and Bianca to truly understand the other`s ethical views? Does understanding require the same meaning when using phrases such as “moral obligation”? Or is similarity in the sense sufficient? However, keep in mind that these nine categories of disagreements are not completely independent of one another. For example, the distinction between poor methods of information processing and illogical reasoning can become blurred. A wrong choice of definitions can also be a form of illogical thinking if those definitions are meaningless (“Let`s define a squircle as a square circle”). And the distinction between standard beliefs and integrated methods of information processing can be equally blurred, as the effectiveness of information processing methods may depend on the assumptions these methods make about the environment. It is also possible that there are disagreements that are not due to any of the nine reasons listed above (if you encounter other types of disagreements, please post them in the comments below!).
Such disagreements often lead to arguments or debates of a good nature in which one person questions the truth or validity of what the other is saying. In most cases, it will not progress further and both parties will leave with anyone who thinks they are right. Different perceptions about the goals of the organization, the methods used and who is responsible for what can often lead to conflicts. Open and transparent communication is essential to avoid this. So if you can learn to distinguish real conflicts from simple disagreements, you will automatically remove many false conflicts from your life. Indeed, it is much easier to stop a conflict before it starts than to try to stop one once it has already been set in motion. 5. Logic error. If people on one or both sides of the argument have logical errors or other errors of reasoning, they may end up disagreeing.
One person may argue that individuals will never be able to live more than 200 years because this has never happened before, while another will claim that one day we will certainly have a lifespan of more than 200 years after extrapolating from the increase in longevity over the past 10,000 years. Since both parties have misleading reasoning in this case, there is no reason to expect them to agree (unless their bad logic leads them in the same direction). .